Chuck Todd said today
I like Chuck Todd, the numbers man at MSNBC, but this time he stopped me in my tracks. I heard what I’m about to say before but this time I can’t let it go.
To paraphrase, Chuck said in order to validate Obama’s nomination; he has to impress white people more then he is. He needs the numbers of the white vote to be equal to the numbers he had in earlier primaries or the super-delegates may back off. This made me lose it.
I gathered this opinion as him saying; do better with the white vote or it could be too bad for Obama as far as super-delegate support is concern. To my surprise, he never said that Hillary needs to be more impressive in the black vote in order to validate her chances, or too bad for her. I think if Hillary can’t do better with the black vote then in my eye, she’s dead as far as the supper-delegates too. See how silly this dialog is.
In order to for our party to make a statement like this it means they’re going to take the black for granted like they always do. (NOT THIS TIME) Our party always thinks that the black vote is automatic.
The only big blemish on Obama is Rev. Wright, but for Hillary, It’s Bosnia, Penn, the hospital, taxes, and her Husband; In other words, lying, manipulating, and deceit. Hillary is having a problem with honesty. Do the super-delegates and the working class whites want a liar, manipulator, and deceiver in office as president, isn’t that what we’re trying to get away from.
So biography is an issue for Obama. He’s so clean he’s considered too new. He carries no baggage so he can’t be trusted? Needless to say in order for him to rise to the office of Senator; don’t you think the other candidates that ran against him would have fond some garbage on him that somebody could use? How naïve (typical) is the white vote if that’s the thinking. If so, it goes to show you that you can be a liar, manipulator, be deceitful but be white and be accepted. You can be honest, impressive, intelligent, articulate, organized, and qualified but be black and you scare me. Sounds like bull feces to me.
Who anointed the white vote or should I narrow it down to the white working class to be the barometer in this campaign. Why not let the poor or working poor black people who are the victims of institutional racism votes be the barometer. They don’t count? Does anybody poll them? Doesn’t this sound like a candidate not appealing to all of the electorate? Is the electorate the white working class or all of the people? GET THIS STUIPED RACE, GENDER AND RELIGION BULL MESS OUT OF THIS ELECTION, PLEASE? LETS GET PASS THIS, IT AN OLD RECORD AND IT MAKES ME MAD. HELL, GROW UP. I know you can’t, how naïve (typical) I am. I know you won’t, how naïve (typical) I am. I know you don’t want too, how naïve (typical) I am.
Because of all this mess, I’m beginning to think based on objectivity, a vote for Hillary or McCain is because you’re in denial, racist or ignorant. (Ignorant meaning you don’t know and you don’t know that you don’t know.)
Denial, (You know this country needs to go in another direction and that the face of America is ugly right now and we suck, but change could effect your small peace of the world. You also know that it’s no difference between the Clintons or McCain as far as power is concern. Inter deals will continue to be made, so everything is just fine.) Racist, (You know that integrity, honesty, loyalty, intelligence, and organization is in Obama, but you can’t see your self voting for a black man, something’s got to be wrong with him if we can just wait. He just can’t be that damn good, could he?)
Stick around, you’ll find out starting Jan. 20 2009.
Gaidi